Pro-driving group accused of orchestrating national campaign
A motorists’ campaign group used “dirty tactics” in an effort to “manipulate the outcome” of public consultation on plans to expand the Ultra-Low Emission Zone, according to a London MP.
Janet Daby, who represent Lewisham East, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that she was aware of a “nationwide campaign” orchestrated by FairFuel UK, which calls itself “the real voice of the UK’s 37 million drivers”, that urged members to give negative feedback on TfL’s public consultation which ran from May to July.
The group, which receives funding from the Road Haulage Association and Logistics UK, opposes the Mayor of London’s plan to expand the £12.50 daily charge to cover all of London and has called it a “cash grabbing” attempt.
According to FairFuel UK’s website, more than 5,000 of its members responded to the consultation using a pre-filled in template.
Howard Cox, the group’s leader and co-founder, tweeted that thousands of motorists across the UK, including people in Scotland and Northern Ireland, had responded calling for the London-wide plans to be scrapped.
Janet Daby MP said it was “scandalous” that a group with “vested interests” attempted to “to undermine the integrity of this consultation and consign more Londoners to a lifetime of health issues”.
Howard Cox has been accused of being a “climate denier” over social media posts in which he questions the impact of man-made emissions on climate change. He has also attracted criticism for sharing offensive messages about Sadiq Khan on social media, including a post which compares the Mayor of London to Adolf Hitler.
Mr Cox said, “FairFuel UK asked supporters to put their feelings about the ULEZ expansion to TfL. Over 5,000 in a matter of hours showed their opposition to this cash grabbing anti driver administration in London. This is not dirty tricks; this is democracy representing honesty not idealism.”
The FairFuel UK leader previously contributed to the All Party Parliamentary Group report on fair fuel, which recommended fuel additives as an alternative to the Government’s proposed ban on sales of new petrol and diesel cars from 2030.
That’s despite the fact that Mr Cox is himself the director of a company called Ultimum which markets such fuel additives, something he did not declare in the report.
A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said that he and TfL were aware of the campaign by FairFuel UK and that all consultation responses, including their origin, will be detailed in the final report which will “inform the mayor’s decision”.
Mr Khan’s spokesperson said, “Air pollution is a matter of life and death. Around 4,000 Londoners die every year as a direct result of toxic air, and the majority of these deaths are in outer London where a higher proportion of older people who are more vulnerable to the impacts of air pollution live. This is why TfL and the Mayor consulted on expanding the ULEZ to reduce this toxic air. An estimated five million more Londoners living in outer London are expected to benefit if the ULEZ is expanded London-wide.”
Sadiq Khan has previously said that he would not press ahead with plans to expand the ULEZ if the public “overwhelmingly” rejected them during the consultation.
Nick Rogers, transport spokesperson for the GLA Conservatives, said he hopes the mayor “will listen to the legitimate concerns raised in the consultation and abandon these proposals”.
Mr Rogers said, “The mayor asked people to tell him what they thought of his ULEZ expansion, and the people have spoken. This cost-of-living charge will punish Londoners who cannot afford to upgrade their car, while having a negligible effect on air quality.”
Joe Talora - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More
This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.
Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.
We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.
However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact firstname.lastname@example.org and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.
One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.
If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
For businesses we offer the ch
September 6, 2022
. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.
September 6, 2022