Will TfL Take Control of Nationalised Train Services?
South Western's suburban lines have long been a target for the Mayor
A South Western Railway train. Picture: CA850
December 4, 2024
With confirmation coming this Tuesday (3 December) that South Western Railway (SWR) will be the first franchise to be taken back into public ownership by the current government, the question arises as to how this will affect suburban routes such as the Hounslow Loop.
The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has long argued that it would make sense that the lines which operated primarily in London and its outskirts should be under the control of Transport for London. This would enable better integration of services and improved operation of Oyster and contactless system with some fares being cheaper for passengers if these services were incorporated into existing zones and price caps. It is also argued that more local control would benefit passengers as for instance many regular users felt SWR prioritised south coast routes during industrial action cancelling all suburban services mean stations such as Brentford, Chiswick and Kew Bridge were completely closed during industrial action.
A recently issued report has concluded that plans for a West London Orbital route would be feasible and this envisages the linking of lines currently used by SWR with those used by London Overground, a process that would be made easier if they came under the same management.
SWR is one of the largest rail franchises in the UK, serving routes from London Waterloo to suburban and long-distance destinations in the south and southwest of England.
London Mayor’s before Sadiq Khan have proposed taking over suburban services of SWR and other rail franchises, but these plans have stalled due to political, logistical, and financial disagreements between TfL and the UK government. Some non-London local authorities and MPS have been opposed to TfL taking over services which operate in their area.
A similar transfer has occurred with some Greater Anglia services, which became part of the London Overground network however, it is believed that the context for SWR is more complicated due to the network's structure.
Recently appointed Transport Minister, Heidi Alexander, used to be London’s Deputy Mayor for Transport in which capacity she oversaw Transport for London so she will be familiar with the Mayor’s aspirations for the suburban rail services.
SWR’s contract comes to an end next May and it remains to be seen if public ownership will raise its performance. Although its punctuality record is patchy, it faces particular challenges including the bottleneck for trains entering and leaving Waterloo. Many of the delays are caused by problems which are Network Rail’s responsibility and this organisation is already in public ownership.
The government says it will save £150 million in fees paid to the franchise owners and no compensation will be paid as the contracts are being allowed to expire with SWR’s.
Publicly run services will be managed by DfT Operator Limited – previously known as DfT Operator of Last Resort Holdings Limited (DOHL) – which will eventually be incorporated into Great British Railways (GBR).
There will be no change ticketing and staffing once the change takes place and the introduction of the new Arterio trains on SWR routes will proceed as they are being leased through Angel Trains.
Ms Alexander, said, “For too long, the British public has had to put up with rail services that simply don’t work. A complex system of private train operators has too often failed its users.
“Starting with journeys on South Western Railway, we’re switching tracks by bringing services back under public control to create a reliable rail network that puts customers first.
“Our broken railways are finally on the fast track to repairing and rebuilding a system that the British public can trust and be proud of again.”
Mick Whelan, general secretary of train drivers’ union ASLEF said: “This is the right decision, at the right time, to take the brakes off the UK economy and rebuild Britain.
“John Major’s decision to privatise British Rail in 1994 was foolish, ideologically-driven, and doomed to fail. It was described even by that arch-privateer Margaret Thatcher as “a privatisation too far” and so it proved.
“The privateers have taken hundreds of millions of pounds from our railways and successive Conservative governments have pursued a policy of managed decline which has sold taxpayers, passengers, and staff short.”
RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch said, “This is a significant step forward for passengers, rail workers, and those who want to see an efficient rail system run for the public good, rather than private profit.”
Andy Bagnall chief executive of Rail Partners which lobbies for the private rail operators, said, “Publishing the timeline for bringing SWR, C2C and Greater Anglia into public ownership is a watershed moment that means the Government is now taking charge of fixing the railways, but has parked the big decisions about how to do that until next year.
“Simply changing who runs the trains won’t deliver more reliable and affordable services for passengers, reduce subsidy for taxpayers, or grow rail freight.
“The key to both improving performance and holding down fares is restoring the railway to financial sustainability. It is counter intuitive to start removing private sector operators from the system, with their track record of delivering growth to reduce subsidy, when the question of what will replace them long-term won’t be answered until further rail legislation is introduced.”
The Conservative’s shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon said, “We are concerned that the Government’s plans are simply an ideological undertaking that does not put passengers first.
“Keir Starmer’s latest Transport Secretary has a worrying record of failure when it comes to delivering projects on time that improve passenger services. We will closely monitor the impact of these plans.”
TfL has not commented recently on any plans to take over suburban rail services.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |